MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE KHAN SAWATI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF WATER AND POWER, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Constitutional petition was filed before the High Court of Public Interest litigation. Expected Award of Contract by Government Authority for Electromechanical Works. The tender bidding process was the applicant's acknowledgment that only one company had submitted its bid for the work, thus lacking competition. Which damages public exchequer. The bidding process, which has led to criticism and controversy, has since been canceled by the authorized authority. The second (ie current) bidding did not bring any complaint, criticism or objections from the public or any wrongdoing against award of contractual allegation by the private sector watchdog or media applicant in the present case. There was no solid indictment, that is, the bid given by the party in the second bidding process was flawed and irrelevant; the speculative applicant challenged the speculative, hypothetical concept and therefore appeared fully in the present case. I have been able to issue an acceptance letter, even after more than 14 months after the end of the second bidding phase. As a result, no factual material was brought before the High Court or before the Supreme Court by the petitioner to confirm or give an example. The accusation against the Contract Award taker has not been implemented in the present case since the issuance of the letter of acceptance, and the delay resulted in the loss of public interest, although the allegations, facts and evidence. In the case of the disclosure of the case, the applicant demonstrated a wrongdoing
