CANTONMENT BOARD, RAWALPINDI versus LT. COL. (RETD.) ALLAH DAD KHAN
Sections 60 and 220 (2), (3) of the Cantonment Board revised the rates for the supply of water to its residents through the revision of the Cantonment Board. The applicant was of the view that the Cantonment Board imposed a water tax. Amended the water rates, which tax could only be levied with the prior approval of the Federal Government or provided by section 602 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 through section 60 of the Cantonments Act 1924, provided that the quantity of water Water tax is not levied, the Cantonment Board may receive payment for the supply of water at a fixed rate and such rate canton Nut Act section 1924 is different from the next 220 (2) Water Taxi. Section 220 (2) of the Cantonment AC considered that in the present case neither the legally equivalent nor interchangeable resolution had been approved by the Cantonment Board, which imposed no tax on water. No, T, 1924, but in the present case the supply of water was only amended in accordance with section 220 (3) of the said Act of 1924, passed by the Cantonment Board, no tax was levied in terms of section 60. Not done. The Cantonment Act, 1924, therefore, neither the Federal Government nor any earlier authorization to comply with the provisions of Sections 60 to 63 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, in the case of amending the existing government. Was needed, nor was it necessary. Its residents did not face any illegal interference with the supply of water, according to which the appeal was allowed.
