CH. AHMED NAWAZ versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, JHELUM
Section 34 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 51 and O XXI, R 10 Acquisition of Land Compensation Compound Interest, the payment of the judgment of the referee cannot be challenged in the review, nor can the landowner The Court of Appeal, having obtained the land of the Scope Appellant for the efficacy of the powers, and having been satisfied with the compensation paid by the Collector, filed a reference before the referee judge, who, in his judgment, determined the market value. Compensation was raised by the referee judge, not allowing comprehensive interest in the terms. During the execution of section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the appellant sought a comprehensive interest in the recounting of the amount of the replacement, which was granted by the High Court of Appeal, on appeal. While doing this, put the order aside. No decision of the jurisdiction of the court has ever been passed by the referee judge in favor of the appellant under section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Providing comprehensive interest to him and such decision was not challenged by the appellant either in review or in appeal, so this decree was finalized while implementing the decree and the calculation process. On finding out the exact amount I would pay for it, the executing court could not relieve it. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, under the decree issuing the court which had never been given to him, he could not amend the decree and could not proceed further accordingly the appeal was dismissed.
