MANAGING DIRECTOR, PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE CORPORATION (PIAC) versus ADIL ZAMAN
Section & 41 and (flights ()) flight grounds were laid down and board duties were refused to be resumed. The labor court had dealt with the matter in the case that the employee would not be harassed or subjected to torture, but upon completion of this the duties would be allowed on the board. Applicable Rules According to the employer corporation, the refresher course, which failed to comply with the labor court's order, a contempt of court action was initiated by the employees against the corporation for such disobedience. The issue of consulting for the corporation was with the launch of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2011. The court removed any jurisdiction from the date of the announcement of the said ordinance, 2011. And that the National Industrial Relations Commission had obtained special jurisdiction over the matter after the issuance of the said ordinance, 2011, there was no justification in the ongoing Industrial Relations Ordinance and the Act, which was already pending. , Was transferred to the provisions of the National Industrial Relations Commission. The Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2011 was a practical possibility and could not be applied in the past; the Labor Court, under the circumstances, invested with the jurisdiction to move forward and adjudicate the matter.
