Further investigation against the accused, section 497 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 392/34, alleges that he, along with others, robbed the mobile telephone set and the complainant of cash. And the vehicle recovery memo showed that a car was recovered from the accused, but the chassis number or car engine number was not mentioned in the mentioned memo, but nothing was available to show that the accused. The recovered engine number or vehicle's chassis number was longer than the engine number or the chassis number of the stolen car from the complainant in the absence of any evidence in this regard. It may be that the car was in fact one that was returned to the complainant, the matter needs further investigation, the accused was not included in the complainant's identity. And no cause of such misconduct was reported, which could be removed only because the complainant refused to involve the accused or the police knew that the complainant would not be charged with both the accused. Supported the defendant's innocence plea in the case of being fit to approve the defendant's bail, he was released on bail under conditions \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
