COOPER & CO. (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED CHAIRMAN versus LAUREL NAVIGATION (MAURITIUS) LTD.
Plaintiffs by the plaintiff on payment of the provisions of 42 & Act 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 72 190 Sec201), Section I&A and 202 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLX XX, RR1 and 2 of the suit. Declaration for the maintenance of the ship's business and termination of the contract for services rendered by the plaintiff's contractual plaintiff execute the Medina Request Letter for temporary order dismissal without issuing a 90-day advance notice to the plaintiff Stop requesting that he be interested in the agency. And that it has spent a large sum of money on the management of the containers, trailers, heavy machinery and crew business, which would be wasted on the principal if the refusal to enforce a contractual agreement between the parties was the principal and The agent did not talk about the contract. The plaintiff's status is not of interest to the agency, except that the agent of the commission, according to the contract, was the property of such container, trailer, machinery principal and payment of employees' salaries to the employees by the plaintiff was not reflected in the business income. Used to be The claimant had arranged containers, trailers, machinery and staff to promote the defendant's business with his own fund. No such clause was provided to the plaintiff's ff interest in the agent, therefore, the contract act. The section 202 clause of 1872 does not apply. There is nothing to record that the parties had any clear or implicit behavior in changing the agency's contract internationally. This agency is in favor of the plaintiff without issuing a 90-day advance notice. May be considered illegal
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
