Find a Lawyer

HYDLR ALI BHMJI versus STATE

Scope of section 561A and 249A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 471, 420, 465, 467, 468, 477A and 109/34 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2). The documents appearing with the FIR names of the applicants / accused persons were forged with the role of counterfeiting and tampering, accusing the applicants of depriving the complainant of his property. Going, the process can also be terminated by merging documents together. The course of action, if there was no possibility of punishment, was to seek the provisions of Section 249A, CCPC, to show that the material available on the record was also true at its lapse price. So, this will not be possible. The content of his conviction against the applicant was available on the record and, unless proper evidence was filed, he could not say that there was no possibility of conviction of the accused / applicants for an unusual remedy. Exceptions can be made only in exceptional circumstances, where the court proceedings after prosecution against the accused and the provisions of Section 6161A, CRPC, can ever be used as an alternative case. Cannot be done when the law provides a detailed investigation. In the case of a crime, then generally and generally for the determination of the fate of the case, the procedure laid down in the law must be followed, unless some unusual circumstance is to abandon the regular course and the abnormal course. Should not be followed unless there is an interference test in the criminal proceedings. Keep them going list of advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer