KHURRAM FAROOQ SIDDIQUI versus DEPARTMENT OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE, COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) AND ANOTHER
Sections 156 (1), Clauses (14), (14A), (16), (17), (77), (84), Sections 32, 32A, 35, 39, 131, 131A and 178 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the constitutional application of Article 199 was presented in this case after a three-year trial of termination of the interim invoice, after three years after the registration of the FI, with no provision in the law to present the interim invoice. That was supposed to be the final invoice, with no action taken. The delay of more than three years in the investigation of the material offenses to link the applicants to the commission and the submission of interim challan without collecting any evidence against the applicants is indicative of the fact that any such case in the customs court Will not But the process of law had to be prevented from being misused so as to secure the extremity of justice so that there was no possibility / possibility of punishment for the perpetrators of the petition. Claiming to withdraw unacceptable duty, cheating national exchequer, order proceeding
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009