Find a Lawyer

SHABIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 bail, denied that the accused had not been assigned any special role in the commission of the crime and was involved in the case only because of the application of section 34. ? According to the PP, PPC, when a criminal act is committed by many persons in the common will of all, then each such person is held in such a manner. As if it were done by him alone, otherwise it was now common practice that when it came to pursuing cases, litigation in the court premises was harmed and threatened, and so on. The threat was to stop when the bailiffs were denied.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. RIYASAT HUSSAIN 2009 CLC 966
• Dr. TARIQ MASOOD v. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI 2009 YLR 975
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2009 MLD 976
• COOPER & CO. (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Chairman v. LAUREL NAVIGATION (MAURITIUS) LTD. 2009 CLD 979
• HAMEEDULLAH KHAN PARACHA v. KARACHI AMERICAN SCHOOL 2009 MLD 982
• SARFARAZ v. State 2009 YLR 984
• ABDUL GHANI v. Mrs. FARIDA 2009 YLR 986
• YOUNG MEN\'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (YMCA) through President v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Social Welfare and Women Development Department Karachi 2009 CLC 986

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

famous high court advocate from Kallat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes