Shafiq Shariq, Khalit and Jar defendants for the sued property filed for termination of cases for Sections 6 and 13 have filed a claim as to the dispute over the performance of the students and the purchase of the disputed land. But the appellate court ordered the same subject to be deposited on the plaintiff's land as defendant claimed that in connection with the construction of the plaintiffs' settlement, the plaintiff himself had deferred his claim and both the other witnesses had also I made a controversial statement. Respect which did not support the basic statement given in the trial court, in the circumstances, it was a fact that the plaintiff had failed to perform the summons. The plaintiff had also failed to prove the claim. The evidence on record was set aside for the trial court to reverse the findings of the trial court in connection with the making of the appellate court's findings on the matter, and those of the trial court were restored to the trial. The court had reviewed the true value of the suit land, suggesting that it was close to the road and that the trial court's finding in the population area could not be interfered with in this regard.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
