MST. AMTUL HASEEN versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
Sections 23, 28 and 28 determine a compensation, documentary film as well as the oral evidence of the landlords, and what the eyewitnesses have confessed to prove that the land acquired was of basic quality, almost almost centrally. Was located in the commercial area. Road and / or close to it, as such, it was a commercial property, and even if it was assumed that it was not, the value of the land sold in any kind of taste (such as for sale works) Therefore, each Murley Landers, 000 Land Landowners were entitled to compensation for commercial real estate and on that basis, regardless of the future potential of the property, undoubtedly the future of the underground. The possibilities were of enormous commercial value, so, the landlords, if they were not entitled to Rs. The mortgage application should have approved Rs 85,000 for the house interest at the rate of 8,000. The number was in accordance with the provisions of Section 28, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, so for an increased compensation of Rs 85,000 per marl, landlords were allowed compound interest in terms of Section 28, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, He failed to pay Section 28A, the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, adding that the landlords were compensated, they were also given 15% of the enhanced compensation by the courts (including the trial court and the High Court). Will be done Appellants from the date of notification to the date of payment under section 4 of the Act \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
