Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD ALIAS LILA SAIN versus STATE

Section 2?2 (b) and 7i7f (i), the eyewitnesses were consistent with regard to the procedure for the value of the evidence and their statements did not indicate any material contradiction or improvement. The incident took place at the witnesses' home. The resident of the house was a natural witness, who could not be suspected of being present even on the occasion that he was alleged to have a deep connection with both parties, in which case his lying was not possible. Providing medical assistance The relatives' preference was self-described The slight delay in filing an FIR defense was not seriously questioned on the purpose of the incident. Medical evidence was based on evidence that the victim was reported injured, nine wounded and the weapon used by the attacker. The incident found on the body of the victim showed brutal manner in which the accused committed the murder. 'The knife has been recovered. There is evidence that his fate had no effect on his presence. Reliable and trustworthy ocular evidence The evidence on record did not suggest even remotely fierce enmity between the parties; defense requests for false involvement of the accused by the witnesses were dismissed as guilty and the culprits guilty. Maintained under conditions.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ISRAR AHMED v. Haji MUHAMMAD MUMRAIZ KHAN 2009 MLD 521
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHOKHAR v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2009 PLD 522
• Mst. AMTUL HASEEN v. LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 2009 PLD 524
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. SECRETARY, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE 2009 PLC(CS) 527
• RIASAT ALI v. State 2009 PLD 531
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 533
• RAZIA BIBI v. State 2009 YLR 534
• TAUSEEF alias CAPTAIN v. State 2009 PLD 535

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

property advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes