Sections 12 and 54 sued Wendy for the specific performance of the land sale agreement, and the trial court ordered the collection of the outstanding sale price, according to which further suits Wendy against the property. Complaint was encountered. That the sellers benefit non-profit as they continue, and benefit from the use of the land and, on the other hand, the use of the full value of the land agreed upon in the contract, as a condition, In the present case, it was alleged that the shopkeepers used sophisticated tactics in the suit to ameliorate the injury of the seller, which was out of pocket for the sale price and not even occupied. Was out of It did not benefit under the contract, in the present case there are complaints about shopkeepers' behavior and imbalance under which they benefit the most. This order for the provision of interim relief was one of the aspects that deserved notice in setting the terms of the interim relief, if any appropriate way, in any case, to the trial court to renew its mind on the relevant standards. Allows us to use. Determining the terms of an interim order, if any, in the present case, the matter was referred back to the trial court for reconsideration, if any, to which a vendor was sent to the trial court. Was invited to invite. The parties will respond by explaining their position and rights by filing a fresh request for interim relief conditions, which is not a suit.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
