FARHAN-UD-DIN versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 7 Central Excise Act (I of 1944), Section 3 (1) Section RO 617 (I) / 2000 Secretary RO 503 (I) / 2004 Section RO 648 (I) / 2005, Dated 1 7 2005 Section R O 550 (I) / 2006, dated 5 6 2006 Telephone bills included excise duty for the year 2006, 2007 Domestic consumers' obligation to pay such excise duty in 2007 scope scope R66 (I) / 2000 was rejected by Section R503 (I) / 2004, which was again confirmed by Section RO 648 (I) / 2005, such allegations on telephone services were confirmed on 1, 2005, 7 is in use of the powers under section 7 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005. It is headed 98 and 02 and the excise duty imposed by Section R550 (I) / 2006 on the delivery of Section RO 648 (I) / 2005 will apply to all users of telecommunication services, including domestic users.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
