Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the prosecution failed to prove the motive of the crime; medical evidence was in direct conflict with the ocular evidence in relation to the distance, nature of the injury and the time of death of the deceased. The resident of the village and two witnesses, who were the most natural witnesses to the incident, were stopped by the prosecutor, who feared a delay of three or three hours in filing the FIR. Had presented. It was advised that the complainant had not seen the incident and was summoned from his village to file an FIR, no witnesses other than the complainant had been presented by the prosecution, no one from the nearby area. Also did not come forward to support the version of the prosecution, the sole and light source of the untrustworthy testimony cannot be established by any other independent source as the complainant has not been verified. In the absence of a forensic science laboratory report, the recovery of the weapons of the crime was in vain, another scarce piece of corroborative evidence could not be confirmed, the benefit of the doubt, any minor, had to go to the accused, under the circumstances. Was acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
