The benefit of the doubt in the value of the section 302 (b) / 34 evidence has been postponed to the post mortem of the deceased's body indicating that an FIR was lodged after the initial investigation, the assailants or the eyewitnesses said. The name is not mentioned in the FIR, the same thing was of no use. Prosecuting witnesses provided ocular evidence, and Wajitkar's evidence was also a witness of the occasion, who failed to provide any plausible explanation for his presence at the scene of the incident during the strange hours of the night. It was very unnatural, who did not claim to meet each other even when they were present at the relevant time. Witnesses from Ocular and Wojtkar had told a baked story that did not endorse an independent source and did not link the suspect to it. The recovery of the pistol from the alleged crime suspect was inconsistent and the bullet F was not sent to the scene on occasion. Ornik Science Laboratory's opinion on whether the pill was fired from the pistol and whether or not the pistol was in working condition was not discussed on the defense request made by the accused, because the prosecution He himself was unable to prove the case against both of them. The accused accused of any suspicion had the benefit of the doubt and were acquitted in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
