The School Exclusion Certificate prepared by the accused, section 302/337 / D / 337 (i), (ii) / 148/149 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was dismissed by the trial court without an inquiry. The origin of the same berth certificate of the accused issued by the union council, which the complainant relied upon, was preferred over the medical report of the medical board, without any inquiry into the origin of the birth certificate, Even in the absence of a birth certificate, the trial court was obliged to investigate under Section 7 of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance 2000, especially when the medical board allegedly violated a dental surgeon consisting of six doctors. According to the report, the history of the presence of the medical board was trivial in the history of the incident, which led to the arrest The suspect recorded by Lace was also reconciled with the date of birth. On the contrary, the court was not only against the mandatory supply of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 but also against the principles of law set by the Superior Courts, where two views on the age of the accused were possible, in favor of one accused. It was generally accepted and consequently the trial court's affidavit was set aside and the accused was convicted under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, and at the same time, his case was set aside. Was instructed to try,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
