Sections 2302 (b) and 8) 8 (?) / re 34 Testimony of the witnesses The conspiracy, although both are closely related to the victim and after he became aware of the serious plot to kill the accused, brought this fact to the fore. Didn't choose to fetch. The notice of the concerned people or the police was not even disclosed to the complainant, who lodged an FIR against the unknown killers and the evidence of the conspiracy was false and hence the disbeliever complainant. Failure to commit the accused as murderers or to include them as suspects in the FIR was not designated as a motive for the commission of the crime of double murder and the prosecution sought additional Did not prove a single statement of judicial confession. The next day after the incident, neither the credible nor the affecting complainant was an eyewitness to the incident and filed an FIR on the basis of the hearing. The presence of telephonic information by the female suspect and meeting with her is evidence that four robbers shot the two dead by the police at the scene of the incident, after which they usually Was recorded. The preliminary investigation was made after the arrest of the suspect on suspicion of ocular testimony, which was not confirmed by any other source, because of the retrieval of the pistol from the accused and the positive report of the forensic science laboratory. To no avail. After the recovery of the pistol, the aforementioned laboratory investigated unfairly and dishonestly, medical evidence unable to support the prosecution's case.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
