SHAHID ASLAM versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, WAZIRABAD TOWN AT HAFIZABAD
RR 76 and 77 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), section 3 intra-court appeal notorious disqualification throws away votes, the effect of the approval of the application nomination papers Election Tribunal allowed the election petition and the applicants Declared the election on the basis that a returning candidate did not have the educational qualifications and his matric certificate was forged, which was questioned by the appellants in his case that the principle of voting was not applicable because the incompetent notorious Was not Election applicants had made a statement before the Election Tribunal that they were to be elected after the election. It was learned that among the returning candidates, Matrica had a Bogus certificate and admitted in cross-examination that he had returned such statements and records from the election applicants on the basis of the evidence available on his election petition. No objection was raised in front of the officer. Endeavor was not notorious at the time of voting in favor of the successful candidates returned. Such votes could not be voted on by giving seats to the candidates. The Election Tribunal declared the candidates as invalid and illegally successful. As it wasn't. Voters were aware that the appellants who were going to be elected did not have the required qualifications and no action was taken in the knowledge of the selector that the candidate was not matriculate. The nomination papers were accepted without any objection. Voters were unaware of disqualification. The Division Bench of High Court candidates appealed the appeal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
