ALLAH WASAYA versus SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND POWER, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB,LAHORE
Section 68 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, had canceled the order passed by the authority requesting the approval of the lift pump applicants, which rejected the applicants' request for approval of the lift pump in the canal. It was said that the Chief Minister had approved the relaxation of the petitioners' case, it was not open to the authority to approve the lift pump and some others like it also approved the lift pump. Was granted, the petitioner's lawyer cannot be discriminated against in favor of the lawyer. That the High Court itself had ordered the Authority to decide the matter strictly in accordance with the law in the light of the Chief Minister's order, it was only a temporary order and finally the authority had to act within the scope of the law. Had the option of And after the authority finally decided the matter, which had sufficiently fulfilled the mandate of the first order of the High Court, the High Court could not accept the disobedience of the order which had the authority of the authority, It was true that the applicants were seeking references from returning letters. In 1995 1995 96 96, while the ban was imposed by the government through the video letter of discrimination discrimination of 1997 1997 discrimination, but on the contrary, if the applicant could not lift the pump to carry canal water. Allowed to plant In their lands, other farmers having their lands irrigated at the tail of the canal, should definitely be treated with discrimination by the High Court, which, according to its constitutional jurisdiction, had to be balanced, especially.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
