TASHARUF HUSSAIN SHAH ALIAS KHANA SHAH versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 Definition of evidence was to disappear, direct evidence of murder was not available and the prosecution's case is linked to evidence related to the circumstances, by the accused in front of witnesses living in another district. Extra-judicial confession and having nothing to do with or even acquaintance with them was extremely impossible. Otherwise, the evidence of extra-judicial confession, being the weakest type of evidence, was punished in the case of capital punishment. Cannot be established unless otherwise verified by strong evidence. The harassment and subsequent story, drawn after the recovery of the victim's body for the incident charged by the prosecutor, did not appeal the story and has not been proven on record. The defendant was not assisted in the litigation as it was not described by any witness in the same way, otherwise, Hecht's recovery section violated 103 Cr.P.C. And was made of medical evidence accessible to the public at large, the prosecution's case could not be taken forward, as no eyewitnesses were present because of the injuries. The assailants did not indicate to the assailants that the prosecution's evidence was complete with imbalances and impossibilities; there was no evidence of a case against the accused. The accused was acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
