Sections 4 and 13 apply for leave to defend the defendant's case, which is a civil procedure code (v. 1908), A XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 suits that is sued for recovering money based on bank deposit receipts. Is a plaintiff in association with him. The former manager stole such invoices and later completed them by filling them. The bank had filed an FIR and filed a case for cancellation of such receipts. And since the receipts were not a promise notice, therefore, this case was not enforceable, Waldetti Bank accused the plaintiff of being a party to the fraud and theft of such receipts, no consideration in respect of such invoices. No FIR or payment was registered and a lawsuit was filed. The bank upheld its request that the bank alleges that it was not merely a bald accusation, that the allegations of fraud cannot be summarized as recording of the evidence would be required when the dispute was used as evidence. If a source needs a solution, a vacation grant will be the right way.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
