Find a Lawyer

B U K H S H U versus STATE

The provisions of section 7 337 (n), PPC's section 7337 (n) provide for severe and egregious criminal penalties (irrespective of anything contained in this chapter, in all cases of injury). Has brought the matter to the fore. Common offenders should be subjected to action and accordingly. All other types of offenders have been referred by unexpected clause and will be dealt with once pertaining to the relevant injury case by the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2004 (I). This case is further made clear by the section 777N, PPC and by repeating the category in the provisions as well as the minimum sentence of punishment already provided for the relevant injury cases. The clause is specifically designed for the category referred to in section N33 NN only. 2) Not for PPC and any other offender

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• AQSAL alias KALOO v. State 2009 PCrLJ 394
• TASHARUF HUSSAIN SHAH alias KHANA SHAH v. State 2009 YLR 396
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MAGISTRATE SECTION 30, PINDI GHEB, DISTRICT ATTOCK 2009 PLD 401
• A.B.L. v. KHALID MAHMOOD 2009 CLD 401
• ALLAH WASAYA v. SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND POWER, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB,LAHORE 2009 YLR 406
• DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICES LIMITED through Chief Executive v. SUN SHINE SERVICE (REGD) through Chief Executive Officer 2009 CLC 406
• ABDUL SATTAR v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2009 PLD 407
• SAFDAR ALI v. AKBAR ALI 2009 MLD 410

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

female advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes