DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus SUN SHINE SERVICE (REGD) THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Sections 21, 42 and 56 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 105 of the Assessment Act (V of 1882), Section 52 of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Sections 104 and O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 of the Interim Order The plaintiff's contract was licensed by the plaintiff company and the business was running in the defendant's premises. The second case, the balance of convenience, irreparable loss, the holding of the parties, the nature of the suit, the possibility of its termination within the time limit, the parties. Plaintiff, proposing approval of work claim and order approval, failed to make a case for its approval. A temporary injunction in favor of him, because he was the only license holder on whose behalf, no declaration, order or specific performance case could be filed and retained. Most of all, if the plaintiff succeeds in the case. If so, he can recover damages resulting from the termination of the contract or settlement of the property, it is unlikely to suffer any irreparable injury, which cannot be compensated in terms of compensation. It was announced that the termination of the indirect prima contract was in the form of a validly licensed license, which had already expired. Was done and the way available to the plaintiff was by way of damages, the plaintiff could not obtain the permit in the wrap of the injunction, which would otherwise be an illegal injunction provided under OLXX, RR1 and 2. In order to forbid the order, the CPC was set aside by the trial court, in which case an appeal was allowed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
