Section S, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage on the basis of the suit The husband's right suit for the collection of gold jewelry was decided by the trial court And in return his wife was responsible for his return. The amount of Rs 500, which he received as gold jewelry along with the right seal, was rejected by the appellate court as he considered the condition for the return of the gold jewelry. The lawyer had requested that the wife hanged herself. In the case of the defendant returning the gold jewelry to the defendant, the gold jewelry was not mentioned in the petition when the right-of-way appeals court correctly observed that the alleged confession was the highest. There was a more dubious document that could not be relied upon. The wife had fully stated that her signature on the said document had been obtained for the purpose of employment. If the husband wanted to divorce the plaintiff, he would not bother to take her drowning. It was illegal for him. According to the allegations, the gold jewelry was not included in the Haq Maher and the appellate court rightly found that the bride's gifts by the husband, which is the sole property of the wife and could not be taken away by her husband's lawyer, had failed. Identifying any unlawful interference or legal error in the appellate court's improper judgment and order, which is based on valid reasons, is maintained \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
