Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 420/468/471/472/473 bail, further inquiry into the accused's grant was behind bars for more than two and a half years, but not until trial. Had happened The starting law officer failed to identify any criminal material in which the trial court would decide to confirm the statement of a co-accused to link the accused to the commission of the crime or to determine the defendant's innocence. The rest of the case against the accused needs further investigation. In the context of section (2) of section 497, the PC suspect, under the circumstances, was admitted on bail.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2009 YLR 1789
• MARGALLA EDUCATION TRUST v. Dr. Col. (Retd.) M. AFZAL KIANI 2009 YLR 1795
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. Sardar FATEH KHAN 2009 YLR 1797
• ALLAH DITTA v. MUHAMMAD UMAR 2009 YLR 1811
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. WALI MUHAMMAD 2009 YLR 1817
• AHMED SHER KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB LAHORE 2009 YLR 1820
• NAJEEB ULLAH v. Mst. MAKHDOOM AKHTAR 2009 YLR 1823
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2009 YLR 1825

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Machi Goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes