Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 395/412 bail, further investigation, the accused's grant was not designated in the FIR and no role was specified in the supplementary statement in this case. The suspect was involved, which was later recorded. No identification parade was held to identify the accused, with no direct or indirect evidence available on record that could link the accused to the commission of the crime, other than cash and some other articles allegedly cash. Concerning the receipt of money, it would not be enough until it was proved that the money recovered from the accused was exactly what he had looted, in the minds of the people in such a case of the matter. Serious doubts will arise. The role of the trial court and the accused was the same as the co-accused consistency demanded that the accused be allowed bail as it was the case. In no way distinguishable from the co-accused, who had already granted bail, the accused is charged with further investigation of his crime; he was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
