YOUNAS GROUP OF INDUSTRIES THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SAMBRIAL, SIALKOT
Section 20, 25 and 26 sections R410, dated 18 6 2001 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the exemption of customs duty on the import of goods, the notice of receipt of the dues on the applicant for the registration of the same entry. The bill also applied for exemption in customs duty in accordance with Section RO 410, a post-dated check dated 18.06 2001, which was Rs 8,56,000, in respect of duty and tax related bonds. Was. The importer / applicant also received notice by the importer, according to his conditions, the section RO, which demanded Rs. 150533 for recovery, the outstanding amount against the applicant. No details about. In response to the notice, the department requested the recall as if there was nothing pending against it, however, the notice was not taken. Kitchen, which, according to the applicant, was meant to keep anything illegal, the essence of any notice, was to enable anyone affected by it to know the details of the amount mentioned in the notice, in the present case, The applicant was not aware and was not in a position to respond to the aforesaid notice or to resort to other legal remedies available to him under the law, the constitutional petition was allowed and issued to the applicant. The notice was declared illegal and instructed the department to provide necessary details of the outstanding amount against the applicant. According to One, be provided with fresh notices until the work is completed by the Department, the recovery of this amount continues without any legal authority.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
