AHMED SHER KHAN versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB LAHORE
Section Section Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Second review on the same subject, Applicant Retention Member, was badly affected by the order approved by the Board of Revenue in which the second review petition filed by the applicant. Was excluded in Section 8 of the West Pakistan Board. To deal with the review of the Revenue Act, 1957, the word \ A was very important and important, and it itself signified a singular form and, if read together with the words `, is clearly Indicates that there was only one reviewable before the board. Revenue If the legislature intended otherwise, it would certainly have been a word \ review \ and not a review review \ as there was only one reviewable before the Board of Revenue, which was properly filed by the applicant, but It was rejected, the second review on the same subject was not workable, and so the member was rightly held, dismissed as having no qualifications by the Board of Revenue Petition. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
