A. XXXVII, RR 1, 2 and Section 96 suit sued the recipient for the receipt of the money, based on the plaintiff's check, applied for leave to defend the case and delayed the filing of the petition. The trial court also dismissed the petition. He said that the decision of the evidence filed by the plaintiff without proof and the judgment was imposed on the trial court's order that the printing notice presented to the defendant was absolutely vague because he No server was reported to execute the notice. That only a notice was given to the defendant and the notice issued to the defendant was ambiguous and the copy of the plaintiff was not given to the defendant. In such cases, the trial court granted temporary and passing remarks regarding the merits of the petition for leave to appear and to defend it, and there was no evidence. Applying the mind of the court to the merits of the application, the trial court should have entered some evidence of the plaintiff to examine the facts of the case, and the petition filed by the plaintiff to seek remand and before the delay was condoned. The adjournment shall be considered as a trial court which shall be decided in accordance with the law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
