Section 497 (1), Fourth Provincial Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337, 340, 450 and 34 of the Crimes Against Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Enforcement Act) 1985, Section 17 (4). The attempt was made by Um, who was behind bars for more than two years in jail for a misdemeanor, misdemeanor, domestic offense, conviction, common intention, forbidden bail, denial of the accused, The delay was not responsible for the end. On this basis, it refused to allege that the case against him, in the case of section 7, CRPC (fourth), was covered by the fourth proviso where, on the basis of legal delays in the trial under three categories. Guarantees cannot be allowed. (i) A conviction of a first offense punishable by death, or life imprisonment ble (ii) A person who, in the opinion of the court, was a harsh, frustrated and dangerous criminal. (iii) the death penalty, or life imprisonment, for any terrorist act. To decide whether an accused's case was covered by the fourth proviso under Section 497, Cr PC, under Section (1) of the previous conduct. And the criminal record of the accused had to be taken into account, in the light of the evidence brought to the record by the prosecution, the proposal had to be resolved. In the present case, it was alleged that the accused and others along with the complainant's house. Entered into a robbery; and during this incident he killed his wife, there was no enmity between the parties; there was no question of lying. The accused brutally snatched away the life of an innocent woman. The crime was done in a very aggressive way.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
