After the prosecution was completed, section 497 sentencing rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 murder conviction, joint intention bail, grant of the accused, were filed against them on 17 10 2013, when the investigation was completed. , And the challan was also presented before the trial court, under the allegations that, in these circumstances, there was no further need for an investigative purpose. And, if the pre-approved bail was canceled, and the defendants were sent behind bars without jail ad hoc costs, they would face inconvenience, if they were acquitted of the bail bail. As can not be dismissed, there is no useful purpose, the case will be presented, if the bail is canceled or the accused is kept in jail, then the trial court did not exercise its discretion properly while the trial was held. The accused's bail was rejected in the case.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
