MST. FARZANA SIDDIQUE versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Inherent jurisdiction of section 1 561A High Court, the exercise of the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 6161A, CRPC, was neither alternative nor additional to its role, and only in the interest of justice. I should rarely ask for it. In order to resolve a complaint for which no other method was available, it was stated that Section 561A, the CR PC, should not be used to disrupt or divert the usual course of criminal procedure, which It may be necessary to give inherent powers to the High Court. CR to influence any order under the PC, or to prevent any court action from being misused. Or otherwise such powers were too broad to secure the execution of justice, and may be exercised by the High Court at any time, in exceptional cases under section 6161 AA, CRPC. Option, without waiting for the trial court to approve the orders. Section 249A or 265K, CR PC; if the facts of this case are guaranteed to prevent a court proceeding from misuse, or otherwise obtain justice.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
