Section 5, Schedule and 14 Trial Trial for Restoration of Marital Rights and Counsel for Couple Judge The trial court ruled in favor of the husband restoring marital rights, while the marital suit filed by the wife against the husband. Three statements to the Exchequer suit for evidence of her claim were disclosed by the witnesses presented by the husband that the wife had entered into a free marriage agreement with the plaintiff's husband. The plaintiff / wife accepted the marriage contract with the plaintiff's husband. And he also acknowledged his signatures on the contents of the marriage contract and acknowledged that he had made this process through his writing, and even upon signing the affidavit, the wife was a student of M. Phil and not an illiterate woman, whom the plaintiff called. The husband had no idea. Under the circumstances, her case has been proved by careful and credible evidence, and the trial court correctly ruled in favor of the spouse to restore the marital rights, which is evidence of her case in relation to the marriage. I was presented by the wife. The marital agreement failed to prove her case through coercive and credible evidence with her husband's wife; the trial court dismissed their claim on the right to marry, dismissing the lawsuit during the trial. The trial court did not commit any misreading or reading of evidence during the hearing. And the decree was allowed to stand
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
