Sections 447, 427, 109 and 34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 14 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Criminal Offense, Corruption, Confusion, Joint Intent, Theft Is responsible for Tazemir's appeal against the failure of the evidence contradicted the prosecution's version by one eyewitness who testified, while another person failed to record his statement in support of the prosecutor's story, which led to the prosecution's case. The complainant and the accused had raised serious doubts. The individuals were joint owners of the alleged land, and the complainant was not the owner of the disputed land, in which case the statement of Patwari was very important, and the statement of the witnesses raised serious doubts, and will continue to be so. The prosecution failed to prove his case against the suspects beyond any doubt. And the trial court correctly appreciated the evidence on record that there was no illegal or irregular verdict in the aggravating verdict, allowing it to stand.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
