WAK LTD. THROUGH MANAGER FINANCE versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
An FIR was lodged against the applicant company for issuance of a check of Rs 10 million upon termination of the complaint of Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F / 420/468/471 FIR, which was filed The bank lawyer was dishonored for the poor. The applicant has not issued any check to the complainant, but has filed an FIR regarding the loss of checkbook under PPC under section 42020/8 468/1 47, which issued the check in question. Had not been signed by any of its directors nor was it issued to the complainant to the applicant company for the fulfillment of any obligation to establish the offense under Section 948FF, PPC All the required components were to be met in the language of the said section, the applicant did not issue a check for fulfillment purposes. Neither the obligation nor the offer of insufficient funds was disregarded when the basic components stated in the language of Section 489F, PPCW did not meet the facts and circumstances of this case. It has been stated that there was no criminal offense against the applicant who had already filed an FIR for the loss of the checkbook and had also written a request to the bank's chief manager for this. The applicant had no ill intent to stop payment on the stolen checkbook offer, while the applicant had taken precautionary measures by filing an FIR for the loss of the checkbook when a criminal case against the accused came forward. Didn't come, then an FIR might be enough. Because any of the essential components of the offense under Section 9 an F F
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
