Prior to the arrest on the basis of the section 498 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), section 381 account distribution and partnership dispute, the complainant's grant and a partner of the company / firm were involved in criminal and civil litigation. In this case, the false interference of the accused cannot be ruled out. It was reported that some of the lost documents, receipts, receipts and electronic goods were handed over to the firm's designated partner by the accused, which was made easier by being a partner themselves. Access to the said documents, and why he would not plead with the accused to become a carrier for it, did not appeal to the confessional, the documents admit that he was with the firm's said partner. There is no recovery from the accused. Suspicions also arose over the alleged misappropriation of Rs 5,00,000 by the accused, as the usual cash payment was confirmed in the business community and could not be ignored even after 24 days of inclusion. The F-check accused's guilt, therefore, requires further investigation, because the suspect was involved in the case due to instability by the complainant, the suspect having already been approved ad-hoc provisional bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
