Section 2 302 (b) / / 34 / ??4 Evidence of the Benefit of Suspicion Both witnesses examined in the case of the deceased being a real brother, relevant and interested witnesses were the first part of cross-examination of both eyewitnesses. And as well as the indicated purpose in the FIR, due to the date of the trial, they are reported to be in disgust with the accused party. The complainant had a tendency to increase the number of accused, which is clearly in the FIR It appears as well as in his court statement that the nature of the weapon is in the crime. That the accused be ordered to be assaulted and ordered to kill and kill both of his sons; before relying on both eyewitnesses, the accused was in fact involved in a crime related to an empty recovery question. ? On this occasion, the use of bullets and blood, no doubt provided mutual assistance regarding the location of the incident and the weapon used, but not specifically the crime involved in the crime could not be proved by law and This case was not available to the prosecutor to confirm the general testimony of the prosecution's witnesses. The trial court could not pass enough to prove his guilt, the accused was entitled to doubt and avail. The conviction and guilt of the offender was kept aside and he was acquitted on the charge of murder. Was imposed against it. issued
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
