In sections 8 and 42, the original owner of the immovable property in the lawsuit and collision, transferred the property in favor of his two daughters / defendants through a gift or sale mutation, the third daughter of the original owner and his nephew, separated Accuracy was challenged through a separate civil suit. Both the gift and the sale transaction; and claiming that they are the heirs of the original owner, are entitled to inherit their property, the trial court ruled in the case, but the appellate court ruled Both suits were rejected, both gifts and sales edits were confirmed in real-time, in the presence of notable individuals in the area, including the Chairman Zakat Committee Committee, Lumber and the owners of the area, by the Revenue Officer. Self-transfer / life of the original owner nor of the original owner in the life of the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff's original owner's daughters A lawsuit was filed in favor of K's two daughters for the declaration or cancellation of the said gift and sale mutation, later in Jamabandi and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit after the original owner's death. Revenue records based on fraud and misrepresentation, etc., showed that the dispute was properly entered into and was immediately confirmed after several years of actions and the real owner More than the date of the death of the original owner suit was filed, but neither in their case nor in the disclosure of the evidence of the alleged frauds, can these individuals be proven at trial. With the free consent of the property owner during his or her lifetime
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
