Section 9 (c) / 14/15 Prosecution Case The prosecution's case is based on direct evidence presented by two prosecution witnesses, one was a police inspector and the other was a head constable, direct physical and conscious possession of the accused. The retrieval of material obtained from the Positive Report of the Persons and Forensic Science Laboratory Police Inspector not only confirmed its earlier version, but also described subsequent incidents that stated that all material details had a clear function. Was examined, but there was nothing favorable for the accused in his mouth and his testimony remained inconsistent. He was the true witness of the incident and his testimony was rightly regarded, the other witness of the prosecution, the head constable, was also cross-examined by the defense for a long time, but his testimony was also Every aspect of the case has remained unfounded. The witness was an anti-narcotic force official, but since the defense failed to prove any hostility or animosity against the accused persons so that they could be falsely implicated in the crime, their statement was correctly upheld by the trial court. But after confirming the date, time, event, and appearance of the prohibited charism recovered from the secretive caves of the uncovered motorist, the prosecution successfully established and proved that the uncontested testimony of Mana and the prosecution witnesses testified His case against the accused was properly proven to be a crime and he was rightly punished by unknown persons. There was and was sentenced, the lawyer for the accused had failed in any kind of punishment d napayyd decision illegal, irregularity, bdanu
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
