ZARDAD & CO., GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS, ABBOTTABAD THROUGH ZARDAD KHAN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, FRONTIER HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR
Claims for plaintiff by application of section 42 civil code of conduct (v. 1908), section 20 (c), O. VII, R2 and O. VII, R11, for removal and recovery of money Was contested and the eighth, R11, filed a petition under CPC and the territorial jurisdiction of the civil court was also challenged. One of the plaintiffs' rule for the plaintiff was that the reason for the plaintiff's action was that most of the construction work was done at Location A. ; That the plaintiff received the letters A from the respondent. That the defendants had subordinate offices throughout the province, including A's place, and that the jurisdiction of the civil court is correct, that the work done by the plaintiff in District A, in this case, proceeded fully. Was partly and partly exposed. In section 20 (c), a defendant / government at the CPC location cannot be told that they will continue to do business or work for housing or for profit, as stated in Natural Terms are used with reference to the individual. The following two courts were set aside and the matter was remanded in civil court. A for qualifying decisions after appropriate notice to the parties in accordance with the law
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
