A. VII, R 2 The plaintiff for the receipt of the money stated that he had given the suit to his defendant abroad with the promise / promise that the defendant would pay the same in his native village. / Will return, but Defendant failed to do so Defendant denies Plaintiff's claim in his written statement The trial court rejected the Plaintiff who claimed that the Defendant had granted the suit, He did not present any witness to the aforesaid transaction where neither of the two parties was allegedly located nor obtained. Receipt of payment of said amount was made by both the plaintiff's witnesses who claimed that the plaintiff had paid the defendant on three different occasions, contradicting each other on material points, trial of trial, trial In the judgment and injunction, the matter was discussed in detail and the facts and circumstances of the trial case were justified and could not be retained. There was no evidence to be read or no evidence to be read or any patent illegal or legal impairment. Esley and the decree stated that the law had taken action under the trial case and that the evidence that came out would be properly appreciated. The record cannot be interfered with by the High Court for not reading any misrepresentation / evidence or illegally or in the absence of any material malpractice or any legal jurisdiction or defect.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
