Sections 13 and 15 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the rent controller's rent controller on the basis of rent payment, slaughtering and on a somewhat personal basis, accepted the removal request, and the appellate court rented controller owner. The landlord maintained the tenant provided compelling evidence to prove the permanent default of the record, which also showed that the tenant had controlled the shop without question of the landlord. No personal personal need was proved for the tenant, as there was no substance, there was overwhelming evidence on record that there was a personal need for the landlord's choice of landlord, if any. If he had more shops, then the landlord had the option to choose the best shop. Tenant West Pakistan Citizens Rental Restriction Ordinance, 1959 should be banned only if the tenant has to ensure that if the shop is rented out on personal necessity as if the landlord was rented. Or used for other purposes, the tenant was entitled to restitution, which was sufficient security to the tenant. The undisputed ruling of the two courts below was absolutely correct, based on the correct definition of the evidence presented on the record, well-established law and no jurisdiction was identified by the tenant's lawyer so that Demand for intervention by the High Court in the process. Extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction has been removed under Article 199 of the Constitution
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
