Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109 of Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 143 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) denied bail, that the accused was included in the attackers. was not. The fatal indiscriminate firing, but the burden of responsibility was only because of Section 109, the authenticity of the PPC was the same punishment for presenting a commission of a crime which was then the same death sentence. Was set for the perpetrator. Although it should also be considered that the judicial confession by some of the accomplices against the accused was the only evidence against him, he would still not be eligible for release on bail, as per Article 143 of the Law Martyrdom 1984, by the co-accused. The judicial confession to be made was valid factual evidence which could be considered as evidence of circumstances against the partner of the accused who committed the crime. en He himself was never considered to have a sound basis for the sentencing, though it could be alleged, obviously, that the aforementioned judicial confessions did not deserve to be relied upon, but he did not point out any reason. Didn't even try. It was not possible to declare that under the section 109, the aforesaid co-accused specifically named him as one of the abusers and was trapped in such a heinous crime as false and malicious. Every person of the commission of an offense convicted, entitled to PPC, was granted bail, regardless of the merits of the trial, without seeking satisfaction on the conditions presented by section 497 (2), CRPC. , And only because the charge against him was in promoting the commission of a crime,
