Find a Lawyer

ANWAR-UL-HAQ versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU

Section 426 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 10 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) sentenced the accused to ten years imprisonment with the benefit of Section 382B to Section RI. After the PC count, when the appeal against the accused is pending for a long time without his fault, his sentence has to be suspended. The appeal was changed and allowed and the conviction was suspended under circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Education Department, Peshawar v. QASIM SHAH 2009 SCMR 382
• SAIF-UR-REHMAN v. State 2009 PLD 383
• MAMARAS v. State 2009 PLD 385
• SAHIB DAD v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2009 SCMR 385
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR 2009 SCMR 390
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights, Islamabad 2009 PLD 393
• ALI AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2009 SCMR 394
• WAPDA v. Qari MUHAMMAD FEROZE 2009 SCMR 396

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

power of attorney advocate Mangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes