Find a Lawyer

ROZNAMA HAMDARD THROUGH CHIEF EDITOR versus HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION PAKISTAN

Section ((()) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) trademark infringement) Applicant's publication name \ Daily Hamdard newspaper was to use the name for the newspaper published by it. The owner of a registered trademark known as Hamdard was unaware of the applicant's name in the field of Greek medicine, sorbet and other goods, stating that he was already sympathetic and sympathetic. Publish names and magazines in the name of Nehinal. Using this name may suddenly give the impression that there was some publication of the Hamdard National Foundation, namely that the defendant was such a fraud and that is why the High Court rightly declared the applicant's name. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the High Court's decision to grant leave to appeal \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• SAADIA USMAN v. MUHAMMAD USMAN IQBAL JADOON 2009 SCMR 1458
• Dr. M. SOHAIL KARIM HASHMI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 1472
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR 2009 SCMR 1488
• ANWAR ALI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD 2009 SCMR 1492
• STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. FRANKLIN CREDIT AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD. through Attorney 2009 CLD 1542
• SHAHTAJ SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Chief Executive v. ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, KARACHI 2009 PTD 1544
• Dr. ZAHOOR MEHDI v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN/RETURNING OFFICER FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ISLAMABAD 2009 PLD 1
• MAH GUL v. State 2009 SCMR 4

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Gharo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes