Section 302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 law In this testimony (10 of 1984), Article 22 Evidence Reaction Identification Parade Detective Benefit of Suspicion FIR alleges that all three accused overnight One of the accused was killed by a shrub in the backseat on the police party. One of the accused was sentenced to death by the trial court while the other two accused were sentenced to life imprisonment while the High Court sentenced the two accomplices to Section 222 PPC. Sentenced and sentenced under It was taken by the accused that neither the details were recorded in the FIR nor any test identification was paraded during the interrogation. The FIR did not contain the required details about the identity of the accused, nor was it presented to the prosecution, which caused the expulsion to be so deadly. The prosecution's case, especially since neither of the two suspects has been named after the arrest, for investigation, nor was any of the prosecution's witnesses selected or identified during the trial, The prosecution had failed to produce substantive evidence to prove the charge against the accused and there was little doubt that there was a need to go to the accused. The accused was convicted and acquitted. Appeal allowed
