Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F Guarantee, Partial Refund Approval For one or the other reason the complainant filed a lawsuit against him, the trial court ordered the accused The bail granted was revoked by the High Court, usually the accused accused of a criminal offense could not be detained for the purpose of punishment. He remained in custody for a period of six months, and if the prosecution fails to prove his guilt, prolonged detention of the accused will result in his loss and his liberty can be stopped for a long time without any legal justification. Will Section 497, the CCP's unrestricted clause, could not claim bail as a matter of guilt, but such facility could be extended to him as such. The exempt defendant had already returned a large portion of the amount received by the complainant; civil litigation had already been initiated by the complainant who filed the case against the plaintiff. ?

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. Mian NISAR ELAHI 2009 CLD 1442
• SAJJAD AHMAD JAVED BHATTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 1448
• SAADIA USMAN v. MUHAMMAD USMAN IQBAL JADOON 2009 SCMR 1458
• Dr. M. SOHAIL KARIM HASHMI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 1472
• ANWAR ALI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD 2009 SCMR 1492
• ROZNAMA HAMDARD through Chief Editor v. HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION PAKISTAN 2009 CLD 1523
• STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. FRANKLIN CREDIT AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD. through Attorney 2009 CLD 1542
• SHAHTAJ SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Chief Executive v. ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, KARACHI 2009 PTD 1544

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Shujabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes