ANWAR ALI versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD
Section 4 and 5 Service Bogus Academic Certificate Service Tribunal, Principal Government Employees' Decisions The Bogus Academic Certificate was prepared at the time of selection, therefore, they were partially allowed by the Service Services Tribunal filed by government employees. Dismissal and dismissal replaced. Validation of mandatory retirement with pension benefits If the Service Tribunal went through the documents placed before the Inquiry Officer, there could be no opportunity for public servants to show any relaxation in the service tribunal's further criminal action against such persons. Was recommended to the department for this to happen. Instead of demonstrating a lesson for such individuals in the future, government employees, who were found guilty of gross misconduct and fraud, benefited from changing the employment dismissal penalty to mandatory retirement, as they did in the department. I served about 27. The service tribunal was unacceptable in any of the years for such reasons prevailing. The Supreme Court changed the application for leave to appeal and the Supreme Court rejected the decision passed by the service tribunal. Recommended to examine the possibility of prosecuting a criminal case registered against, so that no one dares in the future. Appeals for such misconduct were allowed in state departments
