Find a Lawyer

SAADIA USMAN versus MUHAMMAD USMAN IQBAL JADOON

Section 5 Deferred Defer (Maher Mughal) Demand for Mukher Dover's Recovery The wife filed a case for the recovery of Mukher Dawar (Maher Mulla \), which was ruled in her favor by the Family Court decision and the family There was an order passed by the court. Maintained by the lower appellate court, but under the judgment and decree modified by the High Court's exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, Dover (Mahar Mojjal) will be able to recover either by death or divorce at the time of dissolution of marriage. While the demand for maintenance of the marriage bond was delayed by the parties at the scheduled time where there was no fixed time, the delay was not made immediately because the present wife had not been in the affair. Demanded the same amount of strings. There was no fixed time for payment of deferment, such as Rs. , 000 rupees for marriage will be payable in case of death or divorce dissolution. The High Court decision was based on proper definition of facts and circumstances of the case and thus the rule of the Supreme Court was denied. Was. The judgment passed by the High Court of Appeal was dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• ABDUL RASHID v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, POST OFFICES, ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 1435
• NAZIR SHEHZAD v. State 2009 SCMR 1440
• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. Mian NISAR ELAHI 2009 CLD 1442
• SAJJAD AHMAD JAVED BHATTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 1448
• Dr. M. SOHAIL KARIM HASHMI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 1472
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR 2009 SCMR 1488
• ANWAR ALI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD 2009 SCMR 1492
• ROZNAMA HAMDARD through Chief Editor v. HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION PAKISTAN 2009 CLD 1523

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

law websites from Gari Mori lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes